英文字典中文字典


英文字典中文字典51ZiDian.com



中文字典辞典   英文字典 a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h   i   j   k   l   m   n   o   p   q   r   s   t   u   v   w   x   y   z       







请输入英文单字，中文词皆可：


请选择你想看的字典辞典：
单词字典翻译
geographicus查看　geographicus　在百度字典中的解释百度英翻中〔查看〕
geographicus查看　geographicus　在Google字典中的解释Google英翻中〔查看〕
geographicus查看　geographicus　在Yahoo字典中的解释Yahoo英翻中〔查看〕

安装中文字典英文字典查询工具!


中文字典英文字典工具:
选择颜色:
输入中英文单字

































































英文字典中文字典相关资料:


  • Is there a proper way to use the fv4005 - War Thunder
    The FV4005 stood no chance, and whenever I see one I know it’s an easy kill, because of its huge size, limited mobility, and ridiculously inconsistent firepower (+ huge reload rate) Something like the Jagdtiger or ISU-152 has a similar reload, but actually has armour, and actually does damage, at the cost of being slightly slower (the FV4005
  • Gaijin. Fix the FV4005 - General Discussion - War Thunder
    The damn tank that ripped the turret CLEAN off the Hull of a Centurion, and Vaporized the internals of a Conqueror THROUGH spaced armor, is NOT going to do stuff like this I mean smacking a Panther in the turret front? does nothing 99% of the time, Hitting a IS-3’s front plate? Which is EXACTLY what the 183mm gun was designed to deal with? Takes one crew member, Hitting a TIGER 2 P in the
  • Something is wrong with the 183 mm QF L4A1 of the FV4005
    A few weeks ago, I obtained the FV4005 I think it’s a good vehicle, but the performance of its cannon disappointed me In fact: It struggles to damage the Tiger H1 from the sides and from the rear It has happened to me several times that when shooting a Tiger I from the side, the shot only damaged the track Today, I shot a Tiger I 2 times and didn’t get the kill First shot: from the
  • Is there a proper way to use the fv4005 - War Thunder
    yh, cas is a problem for it but that isn’t really the vehicles fault that’s more of a problem with the gamemode The fv4005 is really fun imo, and sometimes pretty effective Spoiler And also, being so negative about it doesn’t really help
  • FV4005 - Is there any logic to how HESH works? - War Thunder
    the crazy thing is that HESH should work better at close range because of the kinetic energy needed to “pancake” the shell correctly, which in the case of the 165mm and 183mm probably would act like a SAP HE shell on lighter armour just from the sheer mass, yet lighter stuff seems to survive hits incredibly well, Ive had BMP-3s eat direct hits and continue like its nothing
  • FV4005 and Conway, Both on a Centurion Mk. 3 chassis, All 3 different . . .
    I was doing some digging and saw that the FV4004 Conway and FV4005 both use the Centurion Mk 3 Hull However the Conway, FV4005 and Centurion Mk 3 all use the same hull, so why are their speeds different?, FV4005 being the slowest (17 4 mph) Centuion Mk 3 being in the middle (21 5 mph) and Conway being the fastest (23 2 mph), but these were all the same Hull, same engine, same transmission (or
  • FV4005 Stage I suggestion - Ground Vehicle - War Thunder
    The FV4005 Stage I was the predecessor in its program to the Stage II we currently see in-game, the primary differences being it trades the turret “armor” in favor of an autoloader for the 183mm HESH launcher enabling the vehicle to fire around 6 rounds per minute This could be a nice little addition to the British tree, perhaps foldered with the FV4005 Stage II? let me know what you
  • Why has the FV4005 not already been moved down to like 5. 3 if you are . . .
    Its bad enough you act like throwing 40 pounds of C4 at the front of tank is gonna do nothing, and even worse you won’t buff its reload or anything to make up for the fact it doesn’t do anything A Tank with a gun this big and powerful should not have to go around sniping weakspots to get kills it ripped the turret clean of a Centurion MK1 for Snails sake, it nearly did the same to a
  • Fv4005 has been restored! Maybe gaijin can update the . . . - War Thunder
    FV4005 was a possible stopgap tank9 before the final vehicle was finished, similar to how the Caernarvon No it was not It was purely a test bed for the “discount” engineeringly simplified version of the 183mm gun after the semi-auto loaded version was dropped





中文字典-英文字典  2005-2009