英文字典中文字典


英文字典中文字典51ZiDian.com



中文字典辞典   英文字典 a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h   i   j   k   l   m   n   o   p   q   r   s   t   u   v   w   x   y   z       







请输入英文单字，中文词皆可：


请选择你想看的字典辞典：
单词字典翻译
shinned查看　shinned　在百度字典中的解释百度英翻中〔查看〕
shinned查看　shinned　在Google字典中的解释Google英翻中〔查看〕
shinned查看　shinned　在Yahoo字典中的解释Yahoo英翻中〔查看〕

安装中文字典英文字典查询工具!


中文字典英文字典工具:
选择颜色:
输入中英文单字

































































英文字典中文字典相关资料:


  • Sandeep Ors vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 17 April, 2018 - Indian Kanoon
    IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No 5827 of 2016 (O M) Date of decision:17 04 2018 Sandeep and others Appellants Vs State of Haryana and others Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present:- Mr Harkesh Manuja, Advocate for the appellants
  • MIR SINGH ANR v. STATE OF HARYANA ORS | Punjab Haryana . . . - CaseMine
    Rattan Singh and Jaipal filed a common written statement dated 12 12 2007 (Annexure P-3) In this written statement, they did not deny the possession of Mir Singh over the land mentioned therein Later on, Bharta made a request for consolidating clubbing the aforesaid partition applications
  • High Court of Punjab and Haryana
    Hon'ble Supreme Court Orders Judgments in Hindi Punjabi * Hindi version : Judgments arising from State of Haryana * Punjabi version : Judgments arising from State of Punjab Sno
  • Mir Singh Anr vs State Of Haryana Ors on 2 March, 2016 - Indian Kanoon
    A perusal of the application for partition filed by Yashpal, respondent no 7 reveals that, though, he was aware that petitioners No 2 to 5, are married and reside in other villages, he intentionally chose to give a common address for all the petitioners, i e , the address of DINESH petitioner no 1
  • DINESH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
    Adumbrated facts of the case are that respondent No 4-Om Parkash (since deceased) had filed a partition application for partition of land measuring 691 kanal 14 marla situated at village Kavi Tehsil Madloda, District Panipat, as per jamabandi for the year 2019-20, on 20 08 2021,
  • Maman vs F C Haryana Chd And Ors on 16 September, 2015 - Indian Kanoon
    In the reply filed by respondent No 5 it is averred that final partition of the land has already been effected on 30 08 1994 However, in the written statements it has not been mentioned that on the date fixed, petitioner and other respondents in the application for partition were served properly
  • Kanwar Lal vs Financial Commissioner Haryana And Ors on 24 January, 2020
    Respondent No 5-Bishan Devi widow of Kailash Chand son of Ram Kishan moved an application dated 30 10 2002 for partition of the joint holding The petitioner filed a reply thereto and raised a preliminary objection that the land stood partitioned in the year 1975 and that parties are in their respective individual possession
  • Pawan vs Financial Commissioner Haryana And Ors on 26 July, 2021
    The petitioner was a party respondent in an application for partition At the first instance, he raised an objection that the partition application cannot proceed as civil suit challenging the title of the applicants is pending
  • Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority
    In pursuance of the order dated 10 01 2023, a public notice was published in the newspapers “Dainik Jagran” (Hindi) and “the Tribune” (English) for appearance of the respondent with the directions to file written reply failing which ex-parte proceedings would be carried out against the respondent
  • Ramesh vs State of Haryana - 2022 0 Supreme(P H) 2021
    India - Punjab and Haryana Ramesh VS State of Haryana The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the jurisdiction of the Financial Commissioner and the Commissioner in revising partition orders under the un-amended and ame 21 Nov 22





中文字典-英文字典  2005-2009